Although some would trace back the roots of software as a service to mainframe timesharing, what we would now call SaaS, or on-demand computing, is really experiencing its second coming.
The first SaaS generation of the late 1990s promised to make the web a vehicle for application delivery but most of those early, self-styled application service providers, or ASPs, collapsed because of funding issues, limited network speeds and a dearth of specially designed applications. However, over the last several years, the second generation has proven that the on-demand model can work across application types, even for very large deployments.
Why all the fuss about SaaS? The main attractions of the model are that services can be rolled out quickly with a sharp reduction in costs incurred on servers and administrative staff.
All end-users require is a client device that can access the internet, and upgrades and patches are all performed remotely without interruption to service. Charges are predictable and regular, usually paid for on a monthly tariff.
"The future of computing is on the internet. What we're witnessing is the end of software"
Marc Benioff, CEO, Salesforce.com
Registration is free, and gives you full access to our extensive white paper library, case studies & analysis, downloads & speciality areas, and more.
As Steve Jones, head of SaaS at Capgemini’s global outsourcing group, puts it, “SaaS represents a quicker time to market and a more business-centric cost model than most other software licensing models. This means that not only can the business provision the software directly, but that the CIO can align the IT costs more directly to its business impact. SaaS is becoming more of a priority because of these two elements; the CXO isn’t after SaaS per se, but an answer that is good enough, quickly provisioned and priced in line with the benefit it delivers.”
“What we offer is outstanding value,” says John Paterson, CEO of customer relationship management (CRM) SaaS firm Really Simple Systems. “Customers are looking at a CRM roll-out costing £50,000 to £100,000 and we come in at £20,000. Because there’s no customisation, it’s quick to deliver; on the other hand, it won’t have the user-specific functionality that you would get with a traditional installation. That’s the trade-off customers are looking at. However, they often put us in as an interim solution while they’re rolling out a bigger system and in more than 50 per cent of cases we end up staying there. The big system is often delayed so even the ‘temporary fix’ often becomes a one-year or two-year temporary fix.”
Although often pigeonholed as only suitable for smaller businesses that need to get projects up and running quickly and at minimal cost, SaaS is proving itself as a model with the legs to appeal to blue-chips. Leading the way is the poster boy of the SaaS generation, Salesforce.com, under the charismatic leadership of ebullient CEO Marc Benioff. Developed as a system primarily intended to automate the needs of sales executives and keep tabs on customers, the company has helped create an opportunity for peers and rivals by proving the scalability and reliability of the model. Also, having originally appealed to smaller firms, Salesforce has been instrumental in showing that SaaS can also be appropriate for large companies. Customers with thousands of Salesforce seats include Merrill Lynch, Cisco Systems, Dell and payroll giant ADP.
Although the bulk of Salesforce revenues still come from sales force automation and CRM services, the company’s bold ambitions extend well beyond those confines. Already closing in on becoming a $1bn revenue company, the nine-year-old firm’s next aim is to be at the centre of a developer nexus where thousands of independent software companies and end-user organisations develop programs using Salesforce’s developer tools and datacentres. Supporters say that plan could make Salesforce the new Microsoft for a generation of computing architectures that rely on resources being located “in the cloud” rather than on the hard disks and tape drives of desktops and servers.
Mal Allerton | Published: 15:41 GMT, 18 May 2009
There is a middle ground if you work with the right vendors. Using CRM in the SaaS model doesnt mean that you have to forgo customisation. We have delivered Microsoft CRM 4.0 internally to 300 users on a SaaS platform with a "pay as you go" model. All the benefits of the SaaS model with all the benefots of being able to customise it to our needs. The more you use CRM the more you realise that you need to customise it.