The current climate of company mergers and downsizing is putting CIOs under pressure to keep the lid on software costs which now account for nearly a third of the average IT budget. Add to the mix software suppliers who are more determined than ever to make sure their customers pay for all the programs they use and software asset management (SAM) seems a no-brainer.
SAM, the process of recording what software licences an organisation has bought and making sure they match up with the programs that staff actually use and the way they use them, not only heads off the unwelcome attention of software suppliers and their lawyers, but can also cut costs.
“If you are on top of your game you save money,” confirms Bobbie Ttooulis of services and software firm Computacenter. “If you have proper SAM in place you are going to have your computing under control and can be pretty confident you are sweating your software assets effectively.”
However, SAM is proving problematic for many companies. Some lack the will to invest in the process, while others are bogged down in turf battles over who should gather the data. Many are just struggling to understand how their licences work.
Finance departments are usually responsible for maintaining asset registers including software, while IT departments know how that software is deployed. “All too often the priority is tracking of physical assets and software is forgotten, so the information is not getting from IT to finance on how software gets used,” says Karen Conneely of asset management software company Real Asset Management.
Despite the availability of databases to record information about licences and so-called discovery tools such as Centennial, Eracent and EasyVista, which dispatch agents to inspect systems and log the software they are using, many users still rely on spreadsheets to track their assets.
Registration is free, and gives you full access to our extensive white paper library, case studies & analysis, downloads & speciality areas, and more.
But experts agree the task has become just too complex to manage by Excel. And it is likely to become even more burdensome as users move to new computing models such as virtual systems which have the capability to create and destroy code within a matter of minutes, making logging its use very difficult.
The predicted boom in browser-based software as a service (SaaS) is likely to create further complications with cloud-based computing sitting alongside, or integrated with, software that companies already run on their own premises. In any case, SaaS subscription terms are likely to become as complex as software licences.
Neither software companies nor their customers have agreed on the best way to reconcile this new kind of usage with old-style licensing. Constant metering of software is one activity that is likely to become much more widespread, according to the experts we spoke to.
“Virtualisation allows the malicious user to pirate software. When companies head down the virtualisation path, tools built in by vendors fail to function,” says Chris Holland, vice president of software rights management at security company SafeNet.
Be the first to comment on this article!