Like retail, the consumer-goods industry is vulnerable to the whims of customer behaviour. Emerging trends, new fashions and fluctuations in disposable income all impact the success of the brands they produce.
But, unlike retail, consumer-goods companies, for the most part, are manufacturing companies too. This brings several challenges.
A fall in consumer demand might be damaging regardless of industry, but for consumer goods it can lead to redundant production capacity; a sharp increase can lead to supply shortfall and unhappy clients.
From a technology perspective, the challenge of how the CIO can provide the type of reliable information on which demand and supply decisions are made is key.
William Grant is one of Scotland’s most famous companies.
But its stable of brands, which includes the world’s biggest selling single-malt whiskey Glenfiddich, can be found far beyond the glens and burns of the Scottish highlands.
“We are approaching turnover of £1bn, have operations in 20 countries and our product is probably sold in 180 or 190 countries across the globe,” explains John Brown, IT director and programme director for global change at the group.
Brown was brought in by the company a little over three years ago to help transform the IT systems of the distiller, which, over the past 10 years, have been patched together to meet the rapid growth of the company.
The result of this growth was a fragmented, federated IT environment poorly suited for the demands of a global organisation with millions of customers in hundreds of countries.
“We don’t have a single set of definitions about the performance of the business, it’s not easy to get a single view of our activities, or a view of where all of our stock sits globally at a single point in time,” says Brown.
“It’s not easy to get a comparison between regions about the net sales value or the contribution of our core brands between regions because we have different definitions, local practices and ways of managing and measuring.”
The company does, however, have increasingly lofty ambitions.
With annual revenue growth in the region of 10 per cent and a burgeoning footprint in the BRICs economies (Brazil, Russia, India and China), it won’t be long until that magic £1bn revenue hurdle is overcome.
“The processes, systems and approaches which have served us so well to date, may not serve us in future,” explains Brown. “In fact, given the growth path that we’re on and given the strategic plan that we’ve got for the next five to ten years, we had clearly reached a stage where we had to do something.”
Core to that has been the deployment of a new, global ERP provided by IFS, closely linked to a Hyperion planning and forecasting system.
Deploying a global ERP wasn’t the only challenge Brown faced. Until recently, the company had been using 12 different charts of accounts structures spread across the world which, for a company the size of William Grant, as he concedes, is tremendously inefficient.
A large part of his challenge was to consolidate working practices. Brown needed to establish a single set of definitions globally, so that the company can now adopt a common approach to how it manages expenditure, such as advertising and promotional campaigns.
A global ERP was a necessity, but because Brown was in the midst of such a broad and deep-rooted change programme, he decided to go about things in a slightly different way.
“We made a conscious decision at the outset to choose systems and use them out of the box,” he explains. “It means that we have had to change our processes. That was a huge hurdle for me to get other leaders in the business over.”
Brown established an axe committee, which is a panel which any proposed deviation from the global model must be put in front of to gain approval.
The CEO sits on the committee, leaving in no doubt of the seriousness with which the company is taking the new approach.
While the need to simplify its internal processes was an important factor in choosing the out-of-the-box approach, so was risk.
Brown felt that the best way to manage the risk of going over budget or not delivering teh full scope,was to adapt the company’s approach to suit an existing product.
“Most of our processes have changed, but what we found was that the impact has been much less than we expected,” he says.